People have not benefitted under DMK rule, says Edappadi K. Palaniswami
The Hindu
‘The DMK is promoting dynasty politics’
AIADMK co-coordinator and Leader of Opposition Edappadi K. Palaniswami on Sunday charged that the people of Tamil Nadu had not benefitted in any way in the one year since DMK came to power. Accusing the State government of sleeping while many people were being ruined due to online gambling, he alleged that law and order had not been maintained properly.
Addressing the AIADMK cadre at Nilavarapatti after hoisting the party flag, he said the DMK did not keep its election promises of scrapping NEET, providing ₹1,000 monthly financial assistance to women family heads, increasing old-age pensions and waiving jewel loans in cooperative banks. He added that of the 45 lakh people, only 15 lakh got their jewellery loans waived.
The DMK government stopped welfare schemes brought by the AIADMK government, including free laptops and subsidies for two wheelers, he alleged.
Mr. Palaniswami stated, “When I was Chief Minister, I implemented a 7.5% reservation for government school students in medical admission. I am from an ordinary family so I could understand the people’s pain. But the current Chief Minister is working for his family. Only in the AIADMK, ordinary cadre can become Chief Minister. If I was in the DMK, it would not have been possible. The DMK is promoting dynasty politics.”
The AIADMK leader claimed that apart from Mr. Stalin, there were now three Chief Ministers — Mr. Stalin’s wife, son and son-in-law.
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.