SC’s aversion to sealed covers comes after years of accepting them
The Hindu
Govt. has often justified the measure citing national security or to safeguard sanctity of ongoing probe
The Supreme Court’s recent expression of aversion to “sealed covers” comes after years of receiving documents and materials in sealed covers from the government.
Sealed covers have been entertained by the court in a range of cases, including ones involving the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, anticipatory bail, etc.
The court had entertained sealed covers from the government in a flurry of important cases, including in public interest litigation (PIL) petitions challenging the Rafale jets purchase, the Bhima Koregaon case, the Assam’s National Register of Citizens, Board of Control for Cricket in India and the anticipatory bail plea for former Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram.
“Sealed cover jurisprudence”, as the top court calls it, precludes the other party from knowing the content of what the government hands over to the court. The government has often justified this in the name of national security or even as a measure to safeguard the sanctity of an ongoing investigation. Questions of fair hearing and principles of natural justice have been raised against sealed covers.
However, the government’s move to submit documents in a sealed cover met with resistance in the Anuradha Bhasin case in January 2020. The case concerned restrictions imposed on the rights of citizens and the Press in Jammu and Kashmir in the name of national security, following the removal of Article 370. In this case, the apex court said the government had to file an affidavit specifying reasons for claiming the “privilege” if it did not want to give copies of the restrictive orders to the petitioners.
“It is not our forte to answer whether it is better to be free than secure or be secure rather than free. However, we are here only to ensure that citizens are provided all the rights and liberty to the highest extent in a given situation while ensuring security at the same time,” an apex court Bench led by Justice N.V. Ramana observed.
Amol Palekar advocates against pre-censorship in films and theatre, urging the government to protect artists' freedom of expression.
BJP legislators demand release of Hindu monk Chinmoy Krishna Das in Bangladesh, threatening protests and border blockade if demands not met.
Odisha loses 790 elephants in a decade, with electrocution as the leading cause of unnatural deaths.
ASI issues notice to halt construction at Arya Akshobhya Teertha Mutt near Rameshwara temple in Shivamogga.
Madurai High Court orders removal of encroachments along Madurai-Dindigul highway, Corporation and Highways Department officials conduct joint operation.
Maharashtra Congress chief initiates signature campaign for return of ballot papers, sparking nationwide debate on EVMs.
Udupi Deputy Commissioner K. Vidyakumari on Wednesday directed the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to undertake periodical maintenance of NH66 without giving room for complaints.
Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw updates Lok Sabha on Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. shareholding, Goa willing to relinquish.
One dies, eight hospitalised after inhaling HCL fumes at pharma company in Andhra Pradesh’s Anakapalli district. About 400 litres of HCL leaked from the reactor-cum-receiver tank at Unit-III of the company, which affected nine workers, says Collector. While the condition of six of them is stable, two are on ventilator support. Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu directs authorities to provide advanced treatment to the victims. Home Minister Anitha expresses anger over repeated such incidents.
Parents and social workers in Thoothukudi request new Anganwadi buildings due to unsafe conditions in current rental buildings.
Delta districts face heavy rainfall, prompting coordinated efforts to mitigate damages, with NDRF teams deployed for rescue operations.