Fencing work on disputed Myanmar border areas stopped, says Manipur CM Biren Singh
The Hindu
‘A high-level official team will be sent to hold talks with Myanmar’, says the Chief Minister.
Manipur Chief Minister N. Biren Singh announced on Thursday that the border fencing work on the disputed areas with Myanmar between BP 80 and 81 had been stopped with immediate effect.
He said, “I had a talk with the Home Secretary on the controversy of the border fencing at disputed areas with Myanmar. It was agreed that the erection of the fencing in these disputed areas will be suspended. The Home Ministry is sending an instruction to the Manipur Chief Secretary. A high-level official team will be sent to hold talks with the Myanmarese counterpart”.
Mr. Biren further said that his government took a very serious view of the highly sensitive issue.
Recently, a fact-finding team of the United Committee Manipur (UCM) had visited the border areas between BP 80 and 81. It found that the fencing erection work was in full swing without any objections from India, notwithstanding the fact that the under- construction fence would take away between one to three km of Manipur’s land. To draw the attention of the State and the Union Government, the UCM had started protests.
The Chief Minister has maintained that a border fence is necessary to check the widespread smuggling of fertilisers, drugs and other contraband items. Since Myanmar, which is part of the Golden Triangle, is Manipur’s neighbour the people had become easy target. The fencing would be erected once the dispute was sorted out, he said.
The work on the 10-km border fence had started near Moreh-Namphalong towns of India and Myanmar. However, it had to be suspended following objections by Myanmar saying that its territory had been encroached. Official sources said that international smuggling had been thriving along this border.
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.