AIADMK general council rejects all resolutions, reiterates demand for single leadership
The Hindu
Council members reiterate the need for a single leader.
Restrained by the Madras High Court, the AIADMK general council that met at Vanagaram, Chennai, on Thursday, could not deliberate on electing former Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami as the party’s sole leader.
However, the Council members (numbering 2,190) submitted a demand reiterating the need for a single leader to the newly elected presidium chairman Tamilmagan Hussain, while the meeting “rejected” all resolutions on the agenda. Mr Hussain said the next general council meeting will be held at the same venue on July 11 where the issue of unitary leadership would be discussed (after overcoming legal hurdles).
It was a show of solidarity for Mr. Palaniswami’s leadership on Thursday. All the roads leading to the venue and majority of the council members were filled with his supporters. The mantle could not be passed though.
A visibly irritated Mr. Palaniswami refused to be garlanded during the meeting.
The party coordinator O. Panneerselvam, who moved the High Court against any amendment to usher in unitary leadership, was not at all welcomed at the meeting. There were shouts of “don’t come” when he entered. He looked lonely and lost in his chair on stage and walked out when they announced the date for the next general council meeting.
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.