Trump Claims To Have Evidence Of Juror Misconduct In Hush Money Case
HuffPost
Prosecutors said the allegations are just a ploy to cast doubt on the verdict.
President-elect Donald Trump’s attorneys are continuing their fight against his hush money conviction by arguing that “grave juror misconduct” tainted the verdict, although prosecutors called the allegation “vague.”
Details of the supposed misconduct were redacted from court filings made public Tuesday.
Trump’s team has been fighting to have the case thrown out entirely by arguing that a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in July on presidential immunity invalidated it.
New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan decided Monday, however, that Trump is not immune to the charges because none of the relevant conduct involved official presidential acts.
Rather, central to the case was an effort to conceal allegations of a sexual encounter with a porn actor from emerging in the days before the 2016 election. Trump denies the sexual encounter and has said he did nothing wrong.