![Madras High Court vacates stay restraining ECI from inquiring into AIADMK leadership dispute](https://th-i.thgim.com/public/incoming/tvrnqr/article69209915.ece/alternates/LANDSCAPE_1200/IMG_Madras_High_Court_Bu_2_1_9CDTOAE0.jpg)
Madras High Court vacates stay restraining ECI from inquiring into AIADMK leadership dispute
The Hindu
The Madras High Court on Wednesday vacated the stay granted by it on January 9 against all further proceedings pending before the ECI in connection with individual representations made by expelled AIADMK members.
The Madras High Court on Wednesday (February 12, 2025) vacated the stay granted by it on January 9 against all further proceedings pending before the Election Commission of India (ECI) in connection with individual representations made by expelled All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) members P. Ravindranath, K.C. Palanisamy, Va Pugazhendi, and three others regarding intra-party affairs.
Third Division Bench of Justices R Subramanian and G. Arul Murugan, however, ordered that the ECI should consider the representations strictly within the parameters of paragraph 15 of the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order of 1968. They also said, the ECI must first satisfy itself that there existed a dispute in terms of paragraph 15, and only after that could it proceed further.
The judges made it clear that the hearing of the parties concerned by the ECI, at the initial stage, must be confined only to satisfy itself regarding the existence of a dispute, which could be decided in terms of paragraph 15 of the Election Symbols Order. Only after conducting such a preliminary inquiry, the commission must arrive at a conclusion as to whether it had the jurisdiction to proceed further.
Paragraph 15 of the Election Symbols Order deals with the power of the ECI to decide which of a splinter group or rival section of a political party could be recognised as the one representing the party. The legal provision states that if the Commission was satisfied, on information in its possession, that there were rival factions in a political party, then it could conduct an inquiry and rule which of those rival factions would be entitled to represent the party.
The Division Bench passed the orders on vacate stay applications filed by AIADMK expelled members P. Ravindranath, a former Member of Parliament and son of former Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam, Va. Pugazhendi, and M.G. Ramachandiran of Ranipet.
Initially, it was an individual named S. Surya Moorthi who had submitted a representation to the ECI on February 12, 2024 (just before the Lok Sabha elections held that year), for freezing AIADMK’s ‘two leaves’ election symbol due to pending civil suits regarding the party leadership dispute. Subsequently, he filed a writ petition in the High Court on February 14, 2024, seeking a direction to the ECI to consider his representation.
The writ petition was disposed of by a Division Bench comprising Justices Subramanian and C. Kumarappan on December 4, 2024, after recording the submission made by the counsel for the ECI that it would dispose of the representation within four weeks. Thereafter, the ECI began issuing notices to the AIADMK on six other representations that had been made by different individuals who had been expelled from the party.
![](/newspic/picid-1269750-20250212035322.jpg)
Parking is an issue faced by many areas in Bengaluru which were once quiet residential localities. With 1.16 crore vehicles in Bengaluru as on March, 2024, multiple pre-owned car showrooms, pre-owned bike showrooms, travel companies, and cab drivers parking their vehicles on the footpaths and on the streets of residential areas, have become a common site these days, breaking many norms of the Parking Policy 2.0 by Directorate of Urban Land Transport (DULT) issued in 2020.