Two parties attempt to represent AIADMK in electoral meeting
The Hindu
CHENNAI
The rift between deposed AIADMK leader O. Panneerselvam and the party’s interim general secretary, Edappadi K. Palaniswami, came out in the open yet again, as supporters of both leaders were deputed by them to represent the AIADMK in a meeting chaired by Chief Electoral Officer Satyabrata Sahoo. While former Minister D. Jayakumar and former Deputy Speaker Pollachi V. Jayaraman said they represented the AIADMK, former legislator Kovai Selvaraj, a strong supporter of Mr. Panneerselvam, was seen seated next to Mr. Jayakumar and Mr. Jayaraman in the meeting hall. The situation turned dramatic when Mr. Jayakumar, on noticing a board reading ‘AIADMK’ placed in front of Mr. Selvaraj, picked it up to place it in front of himself. Speaking to reporters later, Mr. Jayakumar said he and Mr. Jayaraman represented the AIADMK in the meeting, adding he could not comment on others. Mr. Selvaraj explained that the Election Commission of India had records that showed Mr. Panneerselvam as the party’s coordinator.
Earlier, Mr. Sahoo chaired a meeting of representatives of recognised political parties. It may be noted that the Election Commission of India has introduced the collection of Aadhaar data on a “purely voluntary basis” from the existing electors for linking and authentication of electoral rolls data.
The elector can fill up Form-6B and submit the same to the Booth Level Officer concerned physically or online through NVSP, VHA, etc. The collection drive is expected to be completed by April 1, 2023. --
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.