Twitter claims new limits are to fight bots and bad actors
The Hindu
Twitter defends its decision to limit the number of tweets users are allowed to view on the platform.
Twitter defends its decision to limit the number of tweets users are allowed to view on the platform. The limits were in place to combat spam and bot accounts that either scrape user data for AI models or manipulate users. Twitter said it did not warn users about this in advance as it would have helped the bad actors to evade detection.
While verified accounts can see several thousand tweets a day, unverified or newly verified accounts are limited to several hundred tweets a day, according to Twitter owner Elon Musk. However, the limits have been changed several times in the past few days.
“Currently, the restrictions affect a small percentage of people using the platform, and we will provide an update when the work is complete. As it relates to our customers, effects on advertising have been minimal,” Twitter said in a statement.
While restricting the readability of tweets could impact users’ trust in Twitter’s new CEO Linda Yaccarino, the company chief tweeted in support of the strategy. “When you have a mission like Twitter -- you need to make big moves to keep strengthening the platform. This work is meaningful and on-going,” she said, adding that the company was working to “ensure the authenticity” of its userbase.
(For top technology news of the day, subscribe to our tech newsletter Today’s Cache)
In a separate incident during the weekend, Twitter suffered an outage that raised questions on whether recent technical difficulties, related to Twitter’s unwillingness to pay its Google Cloud bills, may have caused such down times. It was reported that the payments were later made.
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.