Sharmila Biswas’ ‘Sutra’ unravels the history of Odissi
The Hindu
Disseminating history through dance
While watching Odissi exponent Sharmila Biswas’ ‘Sutra’ recently in Kolkata, there were several questions that arose in my mind. Questions about history. History of dance. Representation of that history. Ways of showcasing history. Is history only to be contained in textbooks? Is the textbook the best way to disseminate performing arts histories or those histories deserve a different kind of presentation? Performances could have a wider reach after all. And what if you could learn about the history of the art form through the art form itself while watching it live? Could that amount to a more organic and in some ways rigorous engagement with an art form? Will this help to create better informed viewers and rasikas thereby benefiting the art form in a way? These were the questions that I contemplated while and after watching ‘Sutra’. which unravels the history of the Odissi dance form.
It is known to all that any history would privilege certain stories, accounts, facts over others. This has also led to contested histories or multiple histories of an occurrence. Recently, in the sphere of Dance Studies, these contested histories have birthed several debates vis a vis origin theories of classical dance forms. While those differences will remain and these discussions important, it is the artists’ prerogative to choose a retelling of the past that they are ideologically and aesthetically aligned with and then probe the same through their presentation.
Experimentation in dance is not only limited to its formal aspects but also the stories that the dance chooses to tell and how. Such was Sharmila Biswas’ attempt while conceptualising ‘Sutra’ based on her art practice and extensive research into the histories of Odissi. ‘Sutra’ like all works engaging with the past is therefore an interpretation or reading of the past as offered by a practicing artiste for whom Odissi is not just a research subject but her entire life so to speak. Research thus borrows and also enriches from experience. The act of dancing by itself is an archive. The live performance transformed into an archive comprising stories from the past as retrieved in the present.
‘Sutra’ acknowledges various origin sources of Odissi dance — mythological, religious, tribal, martial, affiliations with Buddhism, Jainism, Hindu temple sculptures, state patronage, and Gotipua. While this history is fairly well-established and available in the public domain for consumption, the biggest challenge for a choreographer is to not make it didactic. That is where the creative excellence of a choreographer lies. Sharmila makes this history rather accessible even for the uninitiated through a voiceover that accompanies or precedes the dance. The voiceover in many ways helps to follow the choreography and the chronology of events presented on stage. The movements are simple, unadorned involving a team of carefully selected young dancers. The music is measured, nuanced, and never overpowering. The visuals created through dance accentuating both movement and music. Further, the choreography clearly illustrates that the creation of the classical is influenced or impacted by various other forms often called folk or rural dances. The classical is therefore an assimilation of various sources and influences. The colonial and now archaic debate of folk versus classical is rightfully addressed or hinted at but not in a sloganeering way. If you come to think of it, this is a dissenting history too.
I have a small advice or request for Sharmila and her team to consider. What about Odissi in contemporary times? Can the present remain untouched by the past? What is the story of the dance form today? Are there new trends and undercurrents or challenges? May be she would do another production to reflect on these or perhaps respond by saying that ‘Sutra’ itself reflects Odissi in its contemporariness — the choreography, light design, music selection, costumes, overall aesthetics — everything together.
In her opening remarks before the performance, Sharmila mentioned that ‘Sutra’ also embodies the search that gave her an identity as a dancer, a city dancer embracing and thus trying to understand the rural while tracing the roots of her dance. A member from the audience quizzically asked but what about spirituality? She calmly said — why don’t you watch and find out?
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.