Madras High Court upholds T.N. government’s insistence on public service aspirants being proficient in Tamil
The Hindu
Madras High Court upholds Tamil Nadu government's requirement for Tamil language proficiency in public service recruitment.
The Madras High Court has refused to accept a contention that the Tamil Nadu government’s insistence on scoring 40 out of 150 marks in Tamil language proficiency paper as a pre-condition to evaluate general studies paper, and the decision to consider the cumulative marks scored in both papers for appointment in public service, would amount to giving 100% reservation to Tamil medium candidates.
Justice G.R. Swaminathan dismissed writ petitions filed by 10 English medium aspirants to Group IV service in Tamil Nadu Combined Civil Services. The petitioners had challenged a Government Order (GO) issued on December 1, 2021 and also a consequential notification issued by the Tamil Nadu Public Services Commission (TNPSC) on January 30, 2024 for filling up 6,244 vacancies.
The judge agreed with Advocate General P.S. Raman that the GO as well as the TNPSC notification were fully in consonance with Section 21-A of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act of 2016 and therefore they could not be found fault with. He also took note that Section 21-A was introduced in 2021 and many recruitments had taken place since then.
“Section 21-A of the Act has not been challenged. A subordinate legislation can be assailed only if it can be shown that it is contrary to Constitution or it is ultra vires the parent Act. The petitioners have not been able to demonstrate that the impugned (under challenge) GO is ultra vires the Constitution. The scope of controversy has therefore become limited,” the judge wrote.
He went on to state: “As rightly pointed out by the learned Advocate General, government servants holding Group IV posts will have to have direct interaction with the people... They should be able to fluently converse and write in Tamil. This is a sine qua non for efficient discharge of their functions and duties. This can be found out only by making them write the eligibility paper in Tamil.”
Appearing on behalf of the writ petitioners, senior counsel S. Nalini Chidambaram had argued that the marks scored in general studies paper alone be taken into consideration for recruitment because otherwise candidates proficient in the local language would score full 150 marks in the Tamil paper and get recruited comfortably even if they hardly score anything in general studies.
However, the judge refused to accept her argument that the marks scored in the Tamil paper should be taken into consideration only for the limited purpose of finding out whether the candidates could score a minimum of 40% when it comes to local language proficiency and that those marks in the language paper should otherwise be completely ignored while drawing the merit list.
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.