Madras High Court restrains police from filing charge sheet against YouTuber Karthik Gopinath
The Hindu
However, it allows police to proceed with the investigation of the case related to collection of donation for temple renovation
The Madras High Court on Friday restrained the police from filing a charge sheet against YouTuber Karthik Gopinath accused of having unauthorisedly collected public donations for renovating a temple. The court, however, made it clear that the investigation in the case against him can proceed further.
Justice N. Sathish Kumar passed the interim order after the police sought more time, despite two adjournments already granted, to produce the materials to suspect that he had diverted the donations to his personal accounts. The orders were passed on a petition filed by the YouTuber to quash the First Information Report.
His counsel V. Raghavachari argued that the delay on the part of the police in producing the records only exhibits that they had registered the case and also arrested his client without any substantive materials. He urged the court to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the registration of the FIR.
However, the State Public Prosecutor contended that the police would not be able to collect any material if the entire investigation was stayed.
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.