![Bahraich violence row: No action will be taken on demolition notices until tomorrow: Uttar Pradesh govt assures SC](https://th-i.thgim.com/public/incoming/rnm7so/article68782171.ece/alternates/LANDSCAPE_1200/PTI10_19_2024_000092B.jpg)
Bahraich violence row: No action will be taken on demolition notices until tomorrow: Uttar Pradesh govt assures SC
The Hindu
Uttar Pradesh government halts demolition actions on buildings linked to Bahraich violence accused, pending Supreme Court decision.
Uttar Pradesh government has assured the Supreme Court that authorities won't take any action till tomorrow on demolition notices issued against some buildings belonging to persons allegedly involved in the October 13 Bahraich violence in the State.
Notably, violence erupted between two communities during the Durga idol immersion procession on October 13 in Bahraich, leading to the killing of one person identified as Ram Gopal Mishra.
Also Read: Two men accused of killing youth that led to communal tension in Bahraich shot at in police encounter
Of the five arrested in connection with the Bahraich violence, two were injured during the encounter, while the remaining three were taken into custody, according to Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP) Prashant Kumar, who also stated that the situation is now under control.
Earlier on October 18, the Public Works Department (PWD) issued a demolition notice for the residence of Abdul Hameed, one of the accused in the Bahraich violence, over illegal construction in the area. Following this, a petition was moved in the Supreme Court against the demolition notices issued by the Uttar Pradesh authorities to several people, including Abdul Hameed, an accused in the Bahraich violence over alleged illegal construction.
Three petitioners jointly filed the petition through advocate Mrigank Prabhakar, urging the SC to quash the demolition notices. The petitioners argue that the proposed demolition is punitive, saying, "The defence of "unauthorized construction" is being used as a ruse to carry out punitive demolition and also to illegally overcome the interim protective orders passed by this Court.
Also Read: Putting the brakes on ‘bulldozer justice’