Andhra Pradesh: Around 30 bid for EoI floated by Visakhapatnam Steel Plant; Telangana government backs out
The Hindu
A few multinational companies and a company that has shut down its operations in war-torn Ukraine are among those who filed bids for EoI floated by RINL
Around 30 bids were filed as the extended last date for Expression of Interest (EoI) floated by the Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited (RINL), the corporate entity of Visakhapatnam Steel Plant (VSP), came to an end on Thursday evening.
The Telangana government, which initially evinced interest to participate in the bidding through the Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), backed out, trade union sources said.
The RINL had called for EoI to fund its working capital / raw material requirements against supply of steel. Though the last date was originally April 15, it was extended till April 20.
The bidders included a few multinational companies and a company that had to shut down its operations in war-torn Ukraine, sources in the trade union said.
According to reliable sources, the international companies that participated in the bid included Indo Intertrade AG (Switzerland); Indo International Trading FZCO (Dubai); SB International Inc (Dallas); Global Soft Pte Ltd (Singapore); and Vadim Novinnsky Alexanda, the location of which could not be ascertained.
The Indian bidders included Tata International Ltd.; IMR Metallurgical Resources AG; Soorjmull Baijnath Pvt Ltd; JSW Steel Limited; Vinar Overseas Pvt Ltd; TUF Group; Jindal Steel and Power Limited; Agora Partners; Sri Satyam Ispat Pvt Ltd; Europa Imort Export Ltd; HSCODES Pvt Ltd; Venspra Impex; Elegant Metals and Minerals Pvt Ltd; LK Sri Enterprises LLP; Auroglobal Comtrade Pvt Ltd; Avon Steel Industries Pvt Ltd; and Rootage Import and Export Pvt Ltd.
CITU leader J. Ayodyaram said that 29 companies, including half-a-dozen foreign companies, participated in the bidding. The Telangana government did not participate, he added.
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.