AIADMK’s senior functionaries reiterate decision to hold general council on July 11
The Hindu
Of the 74 members, 65 had turned up for today’s meeting, says Jayakumar
A meeting of headquarters’ office-bearers of the AIADMK, called by Leader of Opposition in the Assembly and party ‘headquarters secretary’ Edappadi K. Palaniswami in Chennai on Monday, decided that the general council (GC) would meet on July 11, as announced at the last week’s meeting.
The agenda for the meeting would be sent through post to members of the GC, D. Jayakumar, organisation secretary and former Minister, told reporters, after the office-bearers held deliberations for nearly 90 minutes.
As for the validity of the day’s meeting, a point of which was raised by the party’s coordinator O. Panneerselvam, the organisation secretary relied on the rule 20A (vii) of the party’s bylaws which stated that in the event of coordinator and co-coordinator getting relieved or till new incumbents for the two posts assumed charge, the office-bearers, nominated by the previous coordinator and co-coordinator, would remain in office and continue to function.
Read also: Chaotic AIADMK general council reiterates demand for single leadership
Mr. Jayakumar went on to say that as the posts of coordinator, co-coordinator and deputy coordinators “ceased to exist”, the office-bearers, as per rules of the by-laws, had requested Mr. Palaniswami, in his capacity as the headquarters’ secretary, to hold a meeting under the chairmanship of Tamilmagan Hussain. This was why the day’s event took place. He claimed that of 74 members, 65 had turned up and four persons, including former Ministers Panruti S. Ramachandran and Dindigul C Sreenivasan had expressed their inability to participate in the meeting due to reasons such as indisposition.
Two other participants said there was no discussion on any disciplinary action to be initiated against Mr. Panneerselvam or his supporters. Mr. Palaniswami confined himself to explaining the reasons for holding the day’s meeting, citing the relevant rules. Asked whether there was any change in the venue of the general council, a senior office-bearer replied that this would be known only on receipt of the invitation and the agenda for the meeting.
Commenting on the discussion that took place at the party headquarters, former MLA and AIADMK spokesperson Kovai K. Selvaraj contended as the meeting itself was “invalid”, it could not adopt any resolution. Besides, he maintained that the actual number of participants in the day’s event was much less than what was claimed by Mr. Jayakumar.
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.