A Mandate for Boston’s Suburbs: Make Room for More Apartments
The New York Times
The state required 177 cities and towns served by public transit to loosen their zoning rules so that more multifamily housing can be built. A number of them resisted.
Working at a cafe in Winthrop, Mass., for the last seven years, Valdineia Santos fell in love with the seaside suburb of 20,000 people, just north of Boston.
But the two-bedroom apartments she found there rented for about $3,000 per month, considerably more than she could afford. So Ms. Santos and her young daughter stayed put in Malden, a city about a half-hour’s drive inland.
“Maybe someday,” she said, winding down her shift at the cafe recently.
A four-year-old state law meant to increase the supply of apartments in dozens of towns around Boston — ideally putting downward pressure on rents — was passed to help people like Ms. Santos. But the law has had a rough road, with a number of towns arguing that the state cannot force them to allow more multifamily housing.
“It’s taking away the rights of citizens, and transferring those rights away from the people who know the town best,” said Diana Viens, a Winthrop resident who has led a movement there to defy the law. “Has the governor ever set foot here? Has she looked at our plan for our downtown?”
The law requires 177 cities and towns served by public transit — spanning eastern Massachusetts from the New Hampshire border to the Cape Cod bridges — to allow multifamily housing to be built without a special permit, in at least one area near public transportation. Most of the communities were supposed to submit revised zoning rules by the end of last year.
Fire engine manufacturing is now largely controlled by three companies. Around the country, prices have soared, and orders can take years to fulfill.
Judge Dale E. Ho of Federal District Court in Manhattan has yet to respond to the government’s request to dismiss the federal corruption case against Mayor Eric Adams.
Mayor Eric Adams spoke at two Black churches in Queens and pushed back at those who “are dancing on my grave.”
President Trump is all about using whatever leverage he can to try to get the best deal for himself — or, he would argue, for the country. Maggie Haberman, a White House correspondent for The New York Times, explains some of his recent transactions, and how he’s defied norms to get his way.
The state required 177 cities and towns served by public transit to loosen their zoning rules so that more multifamily housing can be built. A number of them resisted.
To Michael Hirsch, the desecration of hundreds of graves was a shanda, a shame, a ghoulish crime. He wanted to do something about it.
Demoralized donors are frustrated with Democrats’ failings and worried about retribution from the president. Their frugality has left liberal groups struggling to fight the new administration.
Utah joined two other states in prohibiting collective bargaining for teachers, police officers and other public employees in a move that was seen as a possible blow to the country’s labor movement.
The decision to sue over the $80 million in seized funds comes as the New York City mayor has been accused of supporting the White House’s immigration agenda in exchange for legal leniency.
In Huntsville, a city fueled by defense and aerospace, there is anxiety but also cautious optimism that federal investment may still come its way.
H. Carl McCall, whose 2002 primary race with Andrew M. Cuomo became a racially charged clash, is urging the former governor to run for mayor of New York City.
Democratic donors and Jewish leaders are so unhappy with Jon Ossoff over his position on Israel that some have quietly urged Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, to run against him.
An increasingly influential group of conservative scholars has some drastic ideas about the president’s power.