Why can’t light microscopes see inside cells? Premium
The Hindu
Learn about the diffraction limit in microscopy and how super-resolution microscopy revolutionized the field, earning its developers a Nobel Prize in 2014.
A: The resolution of an instrument that uses light to see things can’t improve beyond a point. This is called the diffraction limit.
The resolving ability of, say, a telescope says how well it can distinguish between two distant objects that are close to each other. The higher the telescope’s resolution, the better its resolving ability.
In the late 1870s and early 1880s, a German engineer and physicist named Ernst Karl Abbe found a formula that connected the maximum resolution to the wavelength of light and a number called the numerical aperture:
d = w/2N
where w is the wavelength, N is the numerical aperture, and d is the maximum resolvable distance.
Thanks to the diffraction limit, scientists could use the light microscope to see cells but not the proteins inside them or a virus attacking them.
But there are optical microscopes today that can see inside cells and even things as small as atoms. This is because, from the 1980s onwards, scientists developed a new technique called super-resolution microscopy, and it wasn’t bound by the diffraction limit.
A great book written and illustrated by English polymath Robert Hooke, Micrographia appeared in bookshops in January 1665. The advance copy of this book, which details Hooke’s exploration into many things small, far, and sometimes elusive, is believed to have been shown to the Royal Society on November 3, 1664. A.S.Ganesh tries to hook you onto Hooke’s story…