What's worse than Premier Kenney calling Danielle Smith's big idea 'nuts'? Her idea

This column is an opinion by Duane Bratt, a political scientist at Mount Royal University in Calgary. For more information about CBC's Opinion section, please see the FAQ.

Premier Jason Kenney waded into the contest to take over his job and party, by warning perceived front-runner Danielle Smith's proposed Sovereignty Act would make Alberta a "laughingstock." 

The UCP leadership candidate's bill would have trouble even becoming law, Kenney said on his weekend radio show, because it would ignore and violate the Constitution in an unprecedented way. The act's aim, in his words: "To not enforce the laws of the land, including federal laws, which include the Criminal Code, which is nuts."

Kenney amplified his critique during a Monday news conference about how to attract people from Toronto and Vancouver to move to Alberta. He juxtaposed bragging about the province's lower housing prices, shorter commutes and greater quality of life with warnings that the Sovereignty Act would make Alberta a wasteland of constitutional crisis and investor fright. I wonder what Torontonians and Vancouverites think?

Smith responded to Kenney's criticism by saying "the premier and other 'experts' should reserve their opinion on this legislation until they can actually read it first."

As a political scientist who closely studies Alberta politics, I am one of those "experts" that Smith said should refrain from commenting until she becomes premier and drafts the legislation

Smith is essentially arguing that policy promises should not be debated during a leadership campaign. This is reminiscent of Kim Campbell's gaffe during the 1993 federal campaign that an "election is no time to discuss serious issues."

While this argument is obviously ludicrous, Smith's idea is even more ludicrous. The Sovereignty Act would allow Alberta to nullify federal laws, and refuse to enforce court rulings and regulatory decisions that the provincial government opposes.

It is the centrepiece of her campaign; her Day One priority. Smith has given speeches about it, her rally audiences have cheered it, she released a platform video describing it, and based it on a larger "Free Alberta Strategy" policy document a group released months earlier.

But, apparently, while she wants supporters to take the Sovereignty Act (as presented) seriously, critics must hold their fire until the fine points are formalized in a legislative bill.   

Having outside legal, constitutional, and political experts evaluate the Sovereignty Act and explaining its potential ramifications is important for UCP members to consider before they cast their votes.

There is a consensus among these experts that the Sovereignty Act is unconstitutional, would violate the rule of law, and plunge Alberta and Canada into a constitutional crisis. Based on the experience of Quebec in the 1970s, it would also lead to investor uncertainty and capital flight. 

And it's not just critics who assert the Sovereignty Act would be unconstitutional. Some of the architects say the same thing. Rob Anderson, the former MLA and current campaign chair for Smith, has said Ottawa cannot make the Alberta government enforce decisions it does not like. "And what are they going to do? Maybe send in the army?"

Barry Cooper, a political scientist who developed the strategy with Anderson and lawyer Derek From, argued that it "would be unconstitutional! Indeed, that is the whole point."