![What could the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling mean for US foreign policy?](https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-03T100240Z_623039824_RC2BL8ACM4H2_RTRMADP_3_USA-COURT-FRACTURES-1720049269.jpg?resize=1920%2C1440)
What could the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling mean for US foreign policy?
Al Jazeera
Presidents have used power overseas with few restraints, a trend experts worry could be strengthened under the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court’s decision to expand presidential immunity has caused alarm among legal experts, who fear the ramifications may extend beyond the country’s borders.
On Monday, the court’s conservative majority ruled that any “official acts” a president takes — even beyond the office’s “core constitutional functions” — would enjoy “presumptive immunity” from prosecution.
But in the US, the president also serves as the head of the military, and experts say Monday’s decision could further strengthen a culture of impunity for actions taken abroad.
Samuel Moyn, a professor of law and history at Yale University, said the decision erodes the few guardrails left to govern US foreign policy.
Already, the US Congress gives presidents wide latitude to take actions overseas, and the country refuses to recognise the authority of bodies like the International Criminal Court (ICC).