Supreme Court tips off a legal fight over NCAA amateurism restrictions
Fox News
The justices heard 95-minutes of oral arguments over whether the NCAA – inter-collegiate sports' main governing body – is using its anti-trust protections to illegally cap non-cash “education-based benefits” for student-athletes.
The justices heard 95 minutes of oral arguments over whether the NCAA – intercollegiate sports' main governing body – is using its anti-trust protections to illegally cap non-cash "education-based benefits" for student-athletes. It is the first time the high court is considering the NCAA's business model in nearly four decades. The very future of college sports – and the big money for many schools that come with it – could be at stake.More Related News