
Supreme Court's ruling in cheerleader case is inadequate for the digital age
CNN
Nicole Hemmer says the US Supreme Court's latest free-speech ruling in Mahanoy Area School Dist. v. B. L. -- involving a cheerleader, Snapchat and a string of four-letter words -- reinforces the historical murkiness of minors' political rights and was far too narrow to be adequate for students in a digital age.
Denied a spot on the varsity cheer squad in early 2017, 14-year-old Brandi Levy took to Snapchat to vent her frustration. "F**k school f**k softball f**k cheer f**k everything," she wrote on a photo she posted to Snapchat, a message and photo-sharing app where posts vanish 24 hours after they appear. Though she sent her post privately to her followers, someone snapped a photo of it and shared it with the squad and coaches. As a result, Levy received a one-year suspension from cheer.More Related News

A little-known civil rights office in the Department of Education that helps resolve complaints from students across the country about discrimination and accommodating disabilities has been gutted by the Trump administration and is now facing a ballooning backlog, a workforce that’s in flux and an unclear mandate.












