
Supreme Court's ruling in cheerleader case is inadequate for the digital age
CNN
Nicole Hemmer says the US Supreme Court's latest free-speech ruling in Mahanoy Area School Dist. v. B. L. -- involving a cheerleader, Snapchat and a string of four-letter words -- reinforces the historical murkiness of minors' political rights and was far too narrow to be adequate for students in a digital age.
Denied a spot on the varsity cheer squad in early 2017, 14-year-old Brandi Levy took to Snapchat to vent her frustration. "F**k school f**k softball f**k cheer f**k everything," she wrote on a photo she posted to Snapchat, a message and photo-sharing app where posts vanish 24 hours after they appear. Though she sent her post privately to her followers, someone snapped a photo of it and shared it with the squad and coaches. As a result, Levy received a one-year suspension from cheer.More Related News