
Supreme Court declines to revisit landmark First Amendment decision, leaving higher bar for libel in place
CNN
The Supreme Court declined to revisit the landmark First Amendment decision in New York Times v. Sullivan. The 1964 ruling created a higher bar for public figures to claim libel and has been a bedrock of US media law.
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the court's refusal to take up the case.
"I would grant certiorari in this case to revisit the 'actual malice' standard," Thomas wrote. "This case is one of many showing how New York Times and its progeny have allowed media organizations and interest groups 'to cast false aspersions on public figures with near impunity.'"

Days after Eric Adams won the New York City mayoral primary four years ago, he was invited to Washington by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi to speak to the House Democratic caucus, touted by the chair of the House Democrats’ campaign arm as a model for campaigns around the country, and welcomed at Joe Biden’s White House.