SC collegium rejects HC judge’s name
The Hindu
The apex court on November 18 had set aside Justice Ganediwala’s two judgments passed in January
The Supreme Court Collegium is learnt to have declined to recommend the name of Justice Pushpa Ganediwala, additional judge of the Bombay High Court, for appointment as a permanent judge against the backdrop of her controversial “skin-to-skin” judgment.
The apex court on November 18 had set aside Justice Ganediwala’s two judgments passed in January, interpreting sexual assault provisions under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The judge, who has been serving at the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, had faced widespread criticism after she granted bail to a man accused of groping a minor, saying there was no “skin-to-skin contact and hence it could not be termed sexual assault” under the POCSO Act.
The collegium, however, approved the proposal for the appointment of three other additional judges of the Bombay High Court as permanent judges of that court.

‘Instead of accusing Gen-Z of lacking skills or discipline, we need to ask what drives them’ Premium
At a recent event held in the city, Cambridge University Press & Assessment launched an advisory panel comprising leaders from top global corporations, aiming to bridge the employability gap in India and better align academic output with industry needs. A whitepaper released at the event highlighted the growing importance of communication skills, the need for stronger collaboration between industry and universities, and strategies to bridge the persistent skill gap.

Under the NBS, newborns are screened for communication disorders before they are discharged from the hospital. For this, AIISH has collaborated with several hospitals to conduct screening which is performed to detect hearing impairment and other developmental disabilities that can affect speech and language development. The screening has been helping in early intervention for those identified with the disorders, as any delay in the identification poses risk and affects successful management of children with hearing loss, according to AIISH.