Peter Nygard sentenced to 11 years for 4 counts of sexual assault
CBC
Former Canadian fashion mogul Peter Nygard, who was found guilty last November of four counts of sexual assault after being accused of attacking five women in his downtown Toronto office, has been sentenced to 11 years in prison.
With credit for time served, Nygard, 83, will serve just under seven years in prison.
In his sentencing, Toronto Superior Court Justice Robert Goldstein described Nygard as a "sexual predator" and a "Canadian story gone very wrong" who used his wealth and power to commit four sexual assaults.
Crown attorneys who prosecuted Nygard had been seeking a 15-year sentence in a federal prison.
Nygard's lawyer had sought a sentence of six years, but that based on his age, declining health and credit for time already served, he would actually serve just under two years. Such a sentence would have allowed Nygard to serve his time in a provincial jail.
During his six-week trial, court heard graphic and disturbing testimony from all five complainants, four of whom said they were in their 20s when they say they were assaulted. One complainant said she was 16 when she alleged the attack by Nygard occurred.
The women testified that from a period of the late 1980s to around 2005, each ended up in Nygard's private bedroom suite in his downtown Toronto building, where they say he attacked, overpowered and sexually assaulted them.
Nygard was acquitted of a fifth count of sexual assault as well as a charge of forcible confinement.
He has been in custody since he was first arrested in Winnipeg in 2020 under the Extradition Act, after he was charged with nine counts in New York, including sex trafficking and racketeering charges.
He still faces sexual assault charges in Manitoba and Quebec. None of the criminal charges against Nygard in Quebec, Manitoba or the U.S. have been tested in court, and he has denied all allegations against him.
More to come.
A city councillor is suggesting the City of Calgary do an external review of how its operations and council decisions are being impacted by false information spread online and through other channels. Coun. Courtney Walcott said he plans to bring forward a motion to council, calling for its support for a review. He said he's not looking for real time fact checking but rather, a review that looks back at the role misinformation played on key issues. Walcott cited two instances in 2024 where factually incorrect information was circulated both online and at in-person meetings regarding major city projects: council's decision to upzone much of the city, and the failed redevelopment proposal for Glenmore Landing. "Looking back on previous years, looking back on major events and finding out how pervasive misinformation and bad information is out there and it's influence on all levels of the public discourse is really important," said Walcott.