Peter Nygard's lawyer quits, saying he can no longer represent former fashion mogul for ethical reasons

The high-profile lawyer who was expected to represent disgraced fashion mogul Peter Nygard in a criminal case in Winnipeg is withdrawing from the position for "ethical reasons," he said.

Brian Greenspan told Manitoba provincial court Judge Stacy Cawley over the phone from Toronto Friday there was "an irreconcilable breakdown in the solicitor-client relationship," characterizing it as "adversarial."

"This is the first time in the 50 years I've practised law that I've made an application, a formal application, to be removed from the record," he said. 

"In my view, [I] have a professional obligation both to the court and to the Crown, once there has been a breakdown in the solicitor-client relationship, to advise the court and the Crown in a timely fashion and to be removed from the record in a timely fashion."

Nygard was found guilty of four counts of sexual assault in Toronto in November, with Greenspan representing him. The assaults happened over a timespan from the late 1980s to about 2005, in the private bedroom suite of Nygard's office building in downtown Toronto.

In an affidavit read by Cawley in court, Seth Weinstein, a partner at Greenspan's firm, said a "number of issues" had arisen in discussions between Greenspan and Nygard, and Greenspan believes it would be a breach of his professional obligations if he didn't withdraw.

Nygard told the judge via phone call from the Toronto South Detention Centre that Greenspan should have waited until he had another lawyer in place to withdraw from the case.

He said he did not want to have any kind of court appearance without counsel present.

The Winnipeg court case is related to offences allegedly committed in 1993, involving a woman who was then 20 years old. The woman alleges Nygard held her captive and raped her after inviting her to a modelling job.

Nygard faces sexual assault and forcible confinement charges. The trial date has not been set.

In an email read by Greenspan, Nygard said the lawyer was "needlessly wasting the court's time and building up his expense bill" by engaging in an "open conflict," when Nygard was trying to solve things in an "amicable and professional manner."

Weinstein's affidavit said it couldn't provide further details without breaching solicitor-client privilege, but that the decision "does not relate to the non-payment of fees."

Greenspan said he would make the transition to a new lawyer at no extra cost to Nygard, and he would send his team's entire file related to the case to Nygard and his future counsel.

The judge said Nygard's concerns were not relevant to the application, and granted the withdrawal.