data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7597/a75972bb8f68115c8c6a903730e750c661f3f07b" alt="No benefit applications were lost despite website error, minister says"
No benefit applications were lost despite website error, minister says
CBC
New Brunswick's minister of finance says he's confident that thousands of applications for the $300 workers' affordability benefit have not gone astray.
Ernie Steeves was responding to the Liberal opposition who revealed in question period that the French-language government website for mailing hard-copy application forms for the money featured the wrong postal address for three months.
"Now we understand why so few citizens have applied for the $300 New Brunswick workers' benefit," Edmundston-Madawaska Centre Liberal MLA Jean-Claude D'Amours said in question period.
"The government put the wrong address on the website on the French version. The wrong address!"
D'Amours said it was impossible to know how many applications went astray or where they ended up.
Steeves and Premier Blaine Higgs brushed off the questions in the legislature, with the minister arguing that "the money is getting out."
He said 88,000 applications had been received as of May 27 with 63,000 cheques sent by mail so far.
Higgs said the Liberals clearly had little ammunition to aim at the government, given the province's strong financial position.
"It's hard to find issues to make up and find problems with. It's hard for the opposition to find something they can really latch on to."
But Higgs himself acknowledged that "we expect more applications, and we're surprised there haven't been more."
The premier announced the benefit in his State of the Province speech in January, when he said he hoped most of the money would be in people's hands by March 31 to help them cope with the high cost of living.
The government estimated that 250,000 recipients would be eligible for the funding, but so far the uptake has fallen far short of that.
D'Amours said that may be because of the error on the website, which first appeared Feb. 27 and was corrected only this week.
It featured a different postal code than the correct version on the English website.