
LS nod for J&K Budget amid spat over Pandits’ exodus
The Hindu
Finance Minister accuses Congress of abandoning community
The Jammu and Kashmir Budget 2022-23 of around ₹1.42 lakh crores was passed by Lok Sabha on Monday amid much acrimony and trading of accusations between the Treasury and Opposition benches over the exodus of Kashmir Pandits from the Kashmir Valley in the 1990s.
Union Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman used strong words to accuse the Congress of leaving the minority Pandit community in the State to its own devices; the Opposition later staged a walkout when MPs were not allowed to intervene when the accusations were being made.
The Opposition had already objected to the bill being taken up for discussion without being circulated in advance to them. But the response of the Minister on the issue of Kashmiri Pandits raised the tempers further. Responding to the discussion on the Budget for Jammu and Kashmir, Ms Sitharaman attacked the Congress over a series of tweets issued by its Kerala unit relating to exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the Valley during the 1990s, an issue that has been foregrounded by the release of the film “Kashmir Files” and mentioned by several members of the Lok Sabha during the debate. While BJP MP from Ladakh Jamyang Tsering Namgyal and Janata Dal (U) MP Sunil Kumar Pintu asked that the film be made tax free across the country, Bahujan Samaj Party’s Danish Ali called for a ban of the film accusing it of inciting feelings of hatred among various communities.
In a series of tweets with the hashtag #KashmirFiles vs truth on Sunday, the Kerala Congress said, “After the terrorist attacks, instead of providing Pandits security, BJP’s Governor Jagmohan asked them to relocate to Jammu. A large number of Pandit families did not feel secure and left the valley in fear.”
Attacking Congress, Ms Sitharaman said, there was series of tweets of Congress saying that Kashmiri Pandit on their own left the Valley and not because they were forced.
“Our party (Congress) belief is that it was not because of terrorism but the movement was due to lure of financial benefit and land offer in Delhi....other belief is there is long battle between separatist and those who stand for India,” she said quoting series of tweets. She also said Congress was an ally to the government of that time when exodus happened and the then Chief Minister left people to fend for themselves when terrorism was on rise.
She also alleged that a Prime Minister during a Congress regime in the past met a separatist who had had allegedly killed an Indian airforce officer and later the same separatist conceded to a foreign TV Channel that he killed an IAF officer.

Former CM B.S. Yediyurappa had challenged the first information report registered on March 14, 2024, on the alleged incident that occurred on February 2, 2024, the chargesheet filed by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), and the February 28, 2025, order of taking cognisance of offences afresh by the trial court.