Judge blocks California law meant to protect children's online safety
The Hindu
A federal judge on Monday blocked California from enforcing a law meant to protect children when they use the internet.
A federal judge on Monday blocked California from enforcing a law meant to protect children when they use the internet, saying the law's commercial speech restrictions likely violate the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.
In granting a preliminary injunction, U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman in San Jose, California, said she was "keenly aware of the myriad harms that may befall children on the internet," but California's law swept too broadly.
The law, known as California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, was passed unanimously last September by the state legislature and signed by Governor Gavin Newsom. It requires platforms, before releasing any online products and services, to assess whether their offerings could harm children.
Businesses must also estimate the ages of child users and configure privacy settings for them, or else provide high settings for everyone.
(For top technology news of the day, subscribe to our tech newsletter Today’s Cache)
The law, modeled after a similar law in the United Kingdom, is scheduled to take effect next July 1.
NetChoice, a trade group whose members include Amazon.com , Alphabet's Google, Facebook parent Meta Platforms and ByteDance's TikTok, sued last December to block the law.
The 29th edition of the Conference of Parties (COP29), held at Baku in Azerbaijan, is arguably the most important of the United Nations’ climate conferences. It was supposed to conclude on November 22, after nearly 11 days of negotiations and the whole purpose was for the world to take a collective step forward in addressing rising carbon emissions.