‘High level of military tension’ with China over last three years: EAM Jaishankar
The Hindu
India-China relations have been "very abnormal" for the last 3 years, with high military tension and broken agreements. India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar said that the Chinese have given various explanations, none of which are tenable.
There has been a “high level of military tension” with China over the last three years, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has said, characterizing the overall state of “ very abnormal” relations between New Delhi and Beijing since the border clashes of 2020.
“If you look at the last three years, it’s a very abnormal state. The contacts have been disrupted. Visits are not taking place. We have, of course, this high level of military tension,” Mr. Jaishankar told an audience in New York during a conversation with former U.S. Ambassador to India Kenneth Juster at the Council of Foreign Relations.
The situation had also impacted the perception of China in India— something that was recovering after the war with China in 1962, according to Mr. Jaishankar. The Minister suggested the issue with China was not just immediate, or medium term but possibly longer.
The very large number of troops amassed at the border— in violation of agreements— had completely impacted the relationship, he said, explaining that it was very hard to try and be normal with a country that “had broken agreements”.
“One of the pleasures of dealing with China is that they never quite tell you why they do things,” Mr. Jaishankar said sarcastically to laughter from the audience.
The relationship has never been easy, he added.
Mr. Jaishankar said that before, during and after the clashes along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the summer of 2020, he had been in touch with his Chinese counterpart (at the time, Wang Yi) but none of the different explanations from the Chinese side have been tenable.
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.