Greenbelt issue a barrier to support for speeding up infrastructure: government poll
CBC
One of the largest factors standing in the way of Ontario being able to speed up critical infrastructure projects is a sense of public distrust fostered by the government's own history with the Greenbelt, polling commissioned by the government suggests.
Leger conducted an online survey about infrastructure in mid-to-late December and held focus groups in January. The Greenbelt was frequently cited, more than a year after media reports first raised questions about government ties to developers and several months after the release of two legislative officers' scathing reports.
Both the auditor general and the integrity commissioner found that the government's process to remove 15 parcels of land from the Greenbelt to build 50,000 homes favoured certain developers.
The integrity commissioner found that then-Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Steve Clark, who resigned after the report was released, violated ethics rules, but said that he had no evidence developers were tipped off about the government's plans for Greenbelt removals. The auditor general found that the property owners stood to see their land value rise by $8.3 billion.
Premier Doug Ford ultimately reversed his decision and returned the parcels of land to the Greenbelt, but the RCMP has launched a criminal investigation.
Leger pollsters said the Greenbelt issue was a "clear example" in participants' minds of government overreach and is a "significant" hurdle to getting Ontarians onside with ways to speed up infrastructure.
"The substantial barrier to implementing any mechanism for fast tracking infrastructure projects lies in the current sense of distrust with the government," Leger wrote in the report on their findings, which the government recently tabled with the legislature.
"Overcoming this, plus some skepticism surrounding motives for expediting projects is crucial for fostering public confidence and facilitating the successful execution (of) initiatives aimed at streamlining processes."
Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner said it's unfortunate the government has put itself in this position when Ontario is facing a housing crisis.
"People don't trust this government to make investments, especially in infrastructure, that put people first instead of the interests of wealthy, well-connected insiders," he said.
"It's clear that the Greenbelt scandal and the $8.3 billion that would have gone to a handful of Ford-connected insiders have really undermined the public's trust and confidence in this government to make investments, especially in housing, that put people first."
The vast majority of survey respondents agreed that infrastructure is important, in particular hospitals and public transportation. Highways and the redevelopment of Ontario Place, some of Ford's signature projects, were seen as less of a priority, Leger said.
"Many voiced frustration and opposition to the government's plans to redevelop Ontario Place," Leger wrote in its report.
The survey also found regional differences in opinions on infrastructure projects, with central Ontarians less likely to prioritize the speed of approval processes.
A city councillor is suggesting the City of Calgary do an external review of how its operations and council decisions are being impacted by false information spread online and through other channels. Coun. Courtney Walcott said he plans to bring forward a motion to council, calling for its support for a review. He said he's not looking for real time fact checking but rather, a review that looks back at the role misinformation played on key issues. Walcott cited two instances in 2024 where factually incorrect information was circulated both online and at in-person meetings regarding major city projects: council's decision to upzone much of the city, and the failed redevelopment proposal for Glenmore Landing. "Looking back on previous years, looking back on major events and finding out how pervasive misinformation and bad information is out there and it's influence on all levels of the public discourse is really important," said Walcott.