Explained | The physics of why a table-tennis ball spins the way it does Premium
The Hindu
In a new study, scientists have reported that only the angle of incidence and the friction of the surface affect the spin of a table tennis ball.
A football bounces to different extents on different surfaces, affecting how well footballers can control their plays. Before and during every game, cricketers monitor the pitch and it is evolving. The concept of spin has an even more pronounced effect in table tennis, where players use gripping rubber-coated paddles to strike a light, hollow ball over a hard surface.
In ball games, understanding how the ball and the playing surface interact is crucial for players to control the ball effectively. This is why the interaction between these two things has drawn the attention of both researchers and sportspersons.
Now, in a new study, scientists have reported that only the angle of incidence – i.e. the angle at which the ball approaches the surface – and the friction of the surface affect the spin of a table tennis ball.
Older studies focused on how table-tennis balls bounced off without spinning at first and without considering the ball’s temporary deformation. The new study investigated the bounce of a table-tennis ball on a rigid and tilted surface at a range of incident speeds.
The study was conducted by a team led by Théophile Rémond, a researcher at the National Centre for Scientific Research, and his colleagues at the Lyon Normal School, France. The paper was published in Physical Review E on May 26.
In an experiment, the researchers observed a non-spinning table-tennis ball bouncing off the surface. The setup had a metal rod with a spring mechanism to launch the ball vertically onto a tilted glass plate. They used high-speed cameras to capture the bounce. The researchers then used these videos to analyse the speed, rotation, and angles of the ball before and after the impact.
They found that the ball rolled perfectly after bouncing over a wide range of incident angles and velocities.
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.