Don't be fooled, 'Green Energy' is neither green nor energy
Fox News
America, so-called 'Green energy' has two problems: First, it doesn’t provide reliable energy and second, it’s not really 'green' because it has a huge 'environmental impact.'
Calling solar and wind "green energy" makes them seem like other forms of energy, just "green." But they’re not. All other forms of energy provide reliable energy—real energy—whereas solar and wind are unreliable parasites of reliable energy. Alex Epstein is the author of "Fossil Future: Why Global Human Flourishing Requires More Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas," and the creator of Energy Talking Points on Substack a source of powerful, concise, well-referenced talking points on energy, environmental, and climate issues.
Why does the "Green" movement oppose nuclear and hydro?
It is because "green" solar and wind are just so cost-effective and so "green"?