Design for redevelopment of Visakhapatnam Railway Station should contain local landmark, say rail users
The Hindu
It is better to take up the work after formation of SCoR Zone, says BJP State Council Member
The proposed design for redevelopment of Visakhapatnam Railway Station, an A-1 category station, presently under the purview of East Coast Railway (E Co R), and is destined to come under the jurisdiction of the Visakhapatnam-headquartered South Coast Railway (S Co R) Zone, is drawing flak from rail activists.
The Rail Land Development Authority (RLDA) came out with a Request For Proposal (RFP) for upgradation of Visakhapatnam Railway Station on EPC (Engineering Procurement and Construction) model at an estimated cost of ₹393 crore.
“It is better to take up redevelopment of Visakhapatnam station after the S Co R Zone is established. It will ensure development of the station, based on the aspirations of the people of the region. Alternatively, a few designs should be placed before the people and based on their opinions, the design can be selected,” said BJP State Council Member N. Gajapathi Rao, who is also a former Member of Zonal Railway Users Consultative Committee (ZRUCC), Bhubaneswar.
The rail activists took to Twitter to deplore the model of the station building. Muralikrishna tweeted: “Sir, planning airport like railway stations in other 2-tiers and old outdated designs for VSKP? If this is final then don’t waste money on this. Increase to 10-12 platforms and lay 3 rd & 4 th line from GPT to VSKP station. Start #SCoR first, how many years for DPR to approve?”
Aditya Sharma tweeted: “This design in no way represents the heritage of the place. It’s so generic. No reference to Simhachalam temple or the beaches, Port or Steel Plant. Pathetic design.”
“What is the process followed for selection of the design? Who are all the stakeholders involved? Ayyagaru tweeted.
“Writing, in general, is a very solitary process,” says Yauvanika Chopra, Associate Director at The New India Foundation (NIF), which, earlier this year, announced the 12th edition of its NIF Book Fellowships for research and scholarship about Indian history after Independence. While authors, in general, are built for it, it can still get very lonely, says Chopra, pointing out that the fellowship’s community support is as valuable as the monetary benefits it offers. “There is a solid community of NIF fellows, trustees, language experts, jury members, all of whom are incredibly competent,” she says. “They really help make authors feel supported from manuscript to publication, so you never feel like you’re struggling through isolation.”
Several principals of government and private schools in Delhi on Tuesday said the Directorate of Education (DoE) circular from a day earlier, directing schools to conduct classes in ‘hybrid’ mode, had caused confusion regarding day-to-day operations as they did not know how many students would return to school from Wednesday and how would teachers instruct in two modes — online and in person — at once. The DoE circular on Monday had also stated that the option to “exercise online mode of education, wherever available, shall vest with the students and their guardians”. Several schoolteachers also expressed confusion regarding the DoE order. A government schoolteacher said he was unsure of how to cope with the resumption of physical classes, given that the order directing government offices to ensure that 50% of the employees work from home is still in place. On Monday, the Commission for Air Quality Management in the National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (CAQM) had, on the orders of the Supreme Court, directed schools in Delhi-NCR to shift classes to the hybrid mode, following which the DoE had issued the circular. The court had urged the Centre’s pollution watchdog to consider restarting physical classes due to many students missing out on the mid-day meals and lacking the necessary means to attend classes online. The CAQM had, on November 20, asked schools in Delhi-NCR to shift to the online mode of teaching.