Border-Gavaskar Trophy | Jasprit Bumrah could take a wicket with every ball, says Sean Abbott
The Hindu
Sean Abbott, a resilient cricketer, embraces his role as a philosopher while waiting for his chance in the Australian Test squad.
It takes a man, who has gone through an emotional wringer, to strike the pose of a philosopher. Sean Abbott has endured a lot in life ever since that fatal bouncer to Phillip Hughes a decade ago. The seamer, who is part of the current Australian Test squad, was practical about his chances while speaking to the media at the Melbourne Cricket Ground here on Monday.
Asked about the absence of Tests in his resume, Abbott calmly replied: “If I am not getting any games it’s a good thing for the team because it means we are at full strength. I am obviously here as cover for any of the bowlers but I am enjoying it.”
“While it is my dream to play Tests for Australia, I am pretty realistic that the guys that are playing are doing a pretty amazing job,” he added.
Besides lauding the trio of Pat Cummins, Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood, Abbott praised other speedsters too: “I would probably throw Scotty (Boland) in there and make it four. Every time he comes in, he does well. A lot of batters around the country breathed a sigh of relief when he came into the Test team. These are great cricketers, and it includes even Jimmy (James) Pattinson, who was the other guy, before Scotty came in.”
Whatever be the circumstances, Abbott wants to be prepared: “Just be ready to go. I have done the white-ball stuff and I put my best foot forward. It’s the same, no matter what format you play.” And as for a rival legend, the seamer declared: “Watching him (Jasprit Bumrah) as a fellow fast bowler, it seems that with every ball he could take a wicket. He swings it both ways, has accuracy and pace. He ticks all the boxes.”
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK president M.K. Stalin on Monday (December 23, 2024) said democracy was facing its gravest threat under the BJP-led Union government with the reckless amendment of Section 93(2)(a) of the Conduct of Election Rules, which, he claimed, would kill transparency in the election process.