
Appeal in Palin's defamation case unlikely to erode press protections, legal experts say
CBSN
Washington — Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin's as-yet unsuccessful legal battle against the New York Times has breathed new life into the debate over whether courts should reconsider First Amendment protections for the press that have been in place for more than half a century.
And while a pair of conservative justices on the Supreme Court has indicated a willingness to revisit the landmark 1964 decision that set the bar for public figures to prove defamation by news outlets, legal experts believe Palin's case won't be the one that satisfies their charge.
"The broader significance of the Palin case has really been overrated generally. I think this is more of a one-off," said David Snyder, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition who represented Mother Jones in a defamation suit. "I don't think this is the beginning of the death knell for Times v. Sullivan, but because it's in New York City, because it's Sarah Palin, because it's the New York Times, it's gotten enormous attention."

The U.S. military scrambled fighter jets Saturday to intercept three civilian planes flying near President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, according to the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). All three aircraft had violated temporary flight restrictions in the area, the command said.

Warren Buffett rarely gives interviews. But also rare is his friendship with the late, trailblazing publisher of the Washington Post, Katharine Graham. "If there's any story that should be told, it should be her story," he said. "If I was a young girl, I'd want to hear that story. It would change my self-image.